# Entity Exposure Index Updated: 2026-08-02T02:42:34.150Z ## Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York Score: 368 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Score: 184 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Score: 184 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Score: 184 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Supreme Court of Rhode Island Score: 184 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Supreme Court of Rhode Island deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## 2021-08825 Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: 2021-08825 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## 2024-13374 Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: 2024-13374 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## 2025-0045-Appeal. Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: 2025-0045-Appeal. deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## 23 WAP 2023 Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: 23 WAP 2023 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## 24-2251 Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: 24-2251 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## 24-7261 Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: 24-7261 deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Civil Rights Corps v. LaSalle Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Civil Rights Corps v. LaSalle deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## D & A Grandview, LLC v. 60 Davidson, LLC Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: D & A Grandview, LLC v. 60 Davidson, LLC deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Galbin Fernandez, in his capacity as the Administrator of the Estate of Eva Pena v. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Galbin Fernandez, in his capacity as the Administrator of the Estate of Eva Pena v. Rhode Island Public Transit Authority deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Punxsutawney Hunting Club v. PGC Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Punxsutawney Hunting Club v. PGC deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## United States v. Anten Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: United States v. Anten deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Williams v. Biggs Score: 179 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: charged / sued Reading: Williams v. Biggs deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Homeland Security Department Score: 118 Level: critical public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Homeland Security Department deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Score: 89 Level: high public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Health and Human Services Department Score: 89 Level: high public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Health and Human Services Department deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## AAPL Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: AAPL deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Alphabet Inc. Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Alphabet Inc. deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## AMAZON COM INC Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: AMAZON COM INC deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## AMZN Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: AMZN deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Apple Inc. Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Apple Inc. deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## AVGO Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: AVGO deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Broadcom Inc. Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Broadcom Inc. deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## GOOGL Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: GOOGL deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## MICROSOFT CORP Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: MICROSOFT CORP deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## MSFT Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: MSFT deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## NVDA Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: NVDA deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## NVIDIA CORP Score: 45 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: NVIDIA CORP deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Nuclear Regulatory Commission Score: 40 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Nuclear Regulatory Commission deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing. ## Securities and Exchange Commission Score: 40 Level: moderate public-record exposure Highest evidence: documented association Reading: Securities and Exchange Commission deserves active public-record review. The score reflects records, categories, relationships or missing-document triggers, not a conclusion of wrongdoing.